NanoBRETTM (Nanoluciferase Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer) is a detection technique used to analyse binding events, signaling pathways and receptor trafficking in live cells. Through the adoption of the Nanoluciferase, it has significantly expanded the range and applications of BRET assays.

Dr Tobias Pusterla Dr Tobias Pusterla

Introducing BRET

Luminescence is one of the most common techniques used in the life sciences to analyse and quantify biological and biochemical processes and interactions. It mainly relies on the two enzymes Firefly (Fluc) and Renilla luciferases (Rluc) to biochemically generate light in the presence of their substrate and does not require an excitation light.

Fluc and Rluc have also been used for Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) experiments. Similarly to FRET and TR-FRET, BRET relies on resonance energy transfer between two chromophores. However, in BRET the energy transfer takes place between a luciferase donor and a fluorophore acceptor.

For BRET to take place, the emission spectrum of the donor luciferase needs to overlap with the excitation spectrum of the fluorophore acceptor. Additionally, donor and acceptor molecules need to be in close proximity (typically 1-10 nm), as the resonance energy transfer decreases with distance (fig. 1).

Typically, donor and acceptor are tagged to proteins of interest to monitor protein-protein proximity and interaction in live cells. The output, known as BRET ratio, is the intensity of the acceptor divided by the intensity of the donor. 1

Fig. 1: Schematic representation of the BRET assay. When the two target proteins are in close proximity, resonance energy transfer from the donor luciferase to the acceptor fluorophore takes place.
There are two main requirements for BRET assays. First, the donor and acceptor tags must not interfere with the function, configuration or cellular localisation of the target proteins. Second, a microplate reader with multi-chromatic luminescence detection and the capability to measure live cells in real-time is required for its quantification. 2

BRET setups and their drawbacks

The most commonly used BRET setup (also known as BRET1), utilises Rluc as energy donor and Yellow Fluorescent Protein (YFP) as acceptor. This pairing achieves an efficient spectral overlap and hence enables resonance energy transfer. However, the spectral proximity between Rluc and YFP generates high background noise, negatively affecting sensitivity and dynamic range (fig. 2).
Fig. 2: The spectral overlap between Rluc and YFP in BRET1 generates high background noise, as part of the donor emission signal is quantified in the acceptor emission channel (dashed area).Consequently, BRET2 was developed to increase spectral separation between donor and acceptor and decrease background noise. BRET2 uses a substrate analogue, DeepBlueCTM, which shifts the Rluc emission peak to shorter wavelengths from about 475 nm with coelenterazine as substrate, to around 395 nm. As donor, GFP2 or GFP10 (Green Fluorescent Protein analogues) are used as they have excitation and emission peaks at 395 and 510 nm, respectively. An example of a BRET2 assay can be found in the application note Sequential or simultaneous emission detection for BRET assays.

Although the large Stokes shift in BRET2 improves spectral resolution and reduces background noise, the emission intensities are much lower than with BRET1, mainly because of a poor quantum yield and luminescence stability. 1

NanoBRET is the latest addition and was developed to overcome the previous weaknesses.

Table 1: Comparison of different BRET set-ups

Name Donor luciferase Substrate Donor emission peak Acceptor fluorophore Acceptor emission
BRET 1 Renilla (36kDa) Coelenterazine 475 nm


GFP (Venus) 

515-560 nm

510-540 nm

BRET 2 Renilla (36kDa) DeepBlueC 395 nm

GFP2, GFP10 

NanoBRET 618


500-540 nm

550-675 nm

550-600 nm

NanoBRET NanoLuc Furimazine 460 nm

AlexaFluor 633


Bodipy (BY630)

618 550-675 nm

515-575 nm

600-700 nm


The NanoBRET set-up

NanoBRET is based on the Nanoluciferase (NanoLuc®; Nluc) with furimazine as substrate and was developed by Promega. Nanoluciferase is the result of the optimisation of a multi-component enzyme present in Oplophorus gracilirostris, a deep-sea shrimp (fig. 3).

Fig. 3: The deep-sea shrimp Oplophorus gracilirostris secretes the precursor of Nanoluciferase.The result of Promega´s optimisation is a small (19 kDa) enzyme with greatly enhanced luminescence (around 150 times the intensity of Fluc or Rluc; fig. 4) and stability (> 2 half-life). Nluc was initially used in gene expression studies as a reporter gene. 3

Fig. 4: Comparison of the emission intensity of Nanoluciferase (Nluc), Rluc and a modified Rluc (Rluc8).
The small size and stronger emission of Nluc led to its rapid uptake in life science and pharmaceutical research, gradually replacing the previously used luciferases, especially where greater sensitivity was required.

The adoption of Nanoluciferase in BRET assays resulted in the creation of a new methodology called NanoBRET. 4 Here, Nluc's stronger luminescence and smaller size offer several advantages over BRET1 and BRET2.

NanoBRET optical features

Compared to Rluc (used for BRET), Nluc has a slightly blue-shifted signal with an emission peak at about 460 nm and a narrower spectral range. In NanoBRET, Promega combined the more effective Nluc donor to a new acceptor, HaloTag®.

HaloTag (HT) is a two-component tag system made of a small protein (33 kDa) that can be genetically fused to a protein of interest and a chloroalkane ligand that can be covalently bound to a fluorophore or other molecules. The best acceptor performance was achieved by matching HT with a red-shifted fluorophore with emission peak at about 620 nm, called NanoBRET 618. This provides a spectral separation from the Nluc of around 170 nm, leading to decreased background noise and improved sensitivity (fig. 5). 4

Fig. 5: Spectra of NanoBRET donor and acceptor. Compared to BRET, the spectral overlap (dashed area) is much reduced.

Alternative NanoBRET acceptors

TAMRA is a commonly used fluorophore with an excitation peak of around 556 nm and an emission peak at about 579 nm. NanoBRET was used to monitor binding of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) tagged with TAMRA to the receptor VEGFR2. 5 This approach is further discussed in our application note NanoBRET assay quantitatively evaluates VEGF binding to the VEGFR2 in real-time in living cells (fig. 6).

Fig. 6: Schematic of the NanoBRET assay used to study VEGF-TMR binding to NLuc-VEGFR2.

Another versatile option is the use of BODIPY fluorophores. BODIPY fluorophores are hydrophobic and have hence good solubility in several solvents, but not in aqueous solutions. In addition, they are relatively unaffected by polarity or pH changes and multiple BODIPY colour variations are commercially available. In our application note NanoBRET assay for monitoring of ligand binding to GPCRs in live cells, GPCR ligand binding was monitored by using BY630 as acceptor. Similarly to BODIPY, Alexa FluorTM dyes are available in different colours and have been frequently used in FRET and TR-FRET assays.

Other fluorophores available as NanoBRET acceptors in the green range are 4-nitro-7-aminobenzofurazan (NBD) and Venus. The latter is a GFP variant, whereas NBD is smaller than TAMRA and BODIPY molecules and exhibits increased fluorescence in hydrophobic environments such as the plasma membrane.

NanoBRET benefits

The advantages of NanoBRET and the use of Nluc over BRET1 and BRET2 methods include:

  • NanoBRET has a linear dynamic range over several orders of magnitude and Nluc generates an around 150 times stronger luminescence signal. This increases NanoBRET assay sensitivity typically by more than one order of magnitude and enables new BRET assays that were not possible with BRET1 or BRET2. For instance, NanoBRET can be used with weak promoters or cells that do not get easily transfected.
  • NanoBRET has a better spectral separation between donor and acceptor emissions, significantly reducing background signals (fig. 7). The spectrum of Nluc is shifted to the blue by about 20 nm compared to Rluc and is about 20% more narrow. In combination with its strong brightness, this results in a significant emission at longer wavelengths and facilitates energy transfer also with more red-shifted fluorophore acceptors.
  • Nluc's small size (around 19 kDa) is less likely to cause steric hindrance and hence alter the physiology and functions of the target protein it is tagged to.
  • Nluc is physically stable under various environmental conditions and correctly folds in extracellular environments. This feature can be in part linked to the fact that its precursor is naturally secreted and has evolved to appropriately fold in the extracellular environment, as compared to the intracellular Rluc. This property enables its fusion to the extracellular N′-terminus of receptors without negatively affecting their localisation at the membrane. 2, 3, 6
Fig. 7: Comparison of the spectral separation of the BRET1 and NanoBRET setups. NanoBRET´s larger separation significantly decreases background noise.

How is NanoBRET detected?

NanoBRET assays are typically run in microplates. Besides microscopic applications, the major part of NanoBRET assays are run in microplates and detected with microplate readers. For this, a luminescence microplate reader with multi-chromatic luminescence detection is required. Moreover, since NanoBRET is mainly used in live cell-based assays for kinetic detection, temperature and atmospheric control should be strongly considered.

NanoBRET assays require wavelength selection as two signals (the donor and the acceptor) are emitted by one sample. Accordingly, plate readers need to be able to select and separately quantify the light emitted by Nluc and the light coming from the acceptor fluorophore to calculate the NanoBRET ratio (fig. 8).
Fig. 8: Simplified schematic of a NanoBRET detection system in a microplate reader. For BRET and NanoBRET assays two optic filters are required to discern between donor and acceptor.

Filter-based plate readers are typically recommended for wavelength selection in NanoBRET assays. Conventional grating-based monochromators play a subordinate role because of their limited sensitivity in the acceptor channel that is mainly due to scattering effects and narrow bandwidths. However, a monochromator technology using Linear Variable Filters (LVF) as available in the CLARIOstar Plus reader provides the sensitivity needed for luminescence detection. An LVF-based monochromator exhibits filter-like light transmission and provides bandwidths up to 100 nm. This assures best performance also in NanoBRET assays (fig. 9).

Fig. 9: Comparison of the performance of NanoBRET on the CLARIOstar Plus with LVF Monochromators and two plate readers equipped with conventional grating-based monochromators.The detection of the two emission wavelengths can be performed sequentially or simultaneously, depending on the plate reader set-up. Typically, readers measure the two signals one after the other. The PHERAstar FSX however can detect the two signals simultaneously, as it is equipped with Simultaneous Dual Emission and a pair of assay-matched detectors (PMTs). This feature halves detection time and reduces data variability.

BMG LABTECH plate readers for NanoBRET detection include the Omega series, VANTAstar, CLARIOstar Plus and PHERAstar FSX.


What is NanoBRET used for?

Since its introduction, NanoBRET has been used to analyse molecular processes with a multitude of applications mainly focussed on protein interaction studies and real-time monitoring of binding events in living cells, as typically cells do not have to be lysed.

NanoBRET for ligand binding studies

Ligand binding studies have been very hard to carry out with BRET1 and BRET2 set-ups mainly because of the large size of the Rluc and Fluc luciferases. In contrast, thanks to the small size of the Nluc, NanoBRET was successfully used in ligand binding and has numerous advantages over traditional radioligand binding assays. For instance, GPCRs were N′-terminally tagged with Nluc as shown in the application note NanoBRET assay for monitoring of ligand binding to GPCRs in live cells (fig. 10). 2

Fig. 10: Simplified schematic of a NanoBRET competition assay with GPCRs.Moreover, the strong intensity of Nluc enables the characterisation of low affinity ligands. Importantly, NanoBRET enables the investigation of ligand binding kinetics in real time in live cells, expanding the possibilities of ligand binding studies.

In this scientific talk, Thomas Machleidt from the Promega corporation discusses the advantages of NanoBRET over conventional BRET and the advantages of the CLARIOstar plate reader. Moreover, he shows a few case studies of protein-protein interaction assays in live cells.

NanoBRET in pharmacology

NanoBRET can also be used in pharmacology for instance for real-time receptor profiling in live cells. This includes ligand binding, secondary messenger coupling, recruitment of scaffolding proteins and internalisation and trafficking. This is addressed in the scientific talk “Real-time profiling of receptor pharmacology”.

In this interview Professor Kevin Pfleger further discusses his work on BRET-based ligand binding and how he uses the PHERAstar and CLARIOstar plate readers for this purpose.


NanoBRET and CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Engineering

The CRISPR/Cas9 system has revolutionised genome engineering. The strong signal of Nluc in combination with the precise editing capabilities of CRISPR/Cas9 enable more physiologically relevant studies in cells. This combination was firstly reported in 2017 and is further discussed in our application note CRISPR/Cas9 genome-edited cells express nanoBRET-donor that monitors protein interaction and trafficking. 7

Here, NanoBRET was used to analyse the recruitment of genome-edited β-arrestin2 and compared to the recruitment of exogenously-expressed (transfected) β-arrestin2 to multiple GPCRs. Moreover, a NanoBRET multiplex assay with two acceptors was used to study CXCL12-induced receptor internalisation and trafficking (fig.11).

Interestingly, a NanoBRET signal could also be achieved using endogenous expression of Nluc-tagged proteins through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair.

Fig. 11: NanoBRET multiplex assay. Cells expressing genome-edited CXCR4 fused to Nluc and transiently co-transfected with cDNA coding for HaloTag/K-ras and Rab4/Venus were used to study receptor internalisation and trafficking induced by CXCL12 in the same cells.
Another example of NanoBRET-based ligand-receptor interaction studies is further discussed in our application note NanoBRET assay quantitatively evaluates VEGF binding to the VEGFR2 in real-time in living cells, where binding of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to the receptor VEGFR2 was monitored. 5

In the following interview Laura Kilpatrick, Chloe Peach and Mark White, authors of the mentioned scientific papers and the application notes discuss their work and the advantages of the BMG LABTECH microplate readers.






More on interaction assays

For a general overview on interaction assays in drug discovery, in this scientific talk our application specialists Anne and Martin highlight how advanced detection technologies such as NanoBRET and TR-FRET can be used in high-throughput drug screening.






  1. Pfleger, K., Eidne, K. Illuminating insights into protein-protein interactions using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET). Nat Methods 3, 165–174 (2006).
  2. Stoddart, L. A., White, C. W., Nguyen, K., Hill, S. J., and Pfleger, K. D. G. (2016) Fluorescence- and bioluminescence-based approaches to study GPCR ligand binding. British Journal of Pharmacology, 173: 3028– 3037. doi: 10.1111/bph.13316.
  3. Hall, M. P., Unch, J., Binkowski, B. F., Valley, M. P., Butler, B. L., Wood, M. G., et al. (2012). Engineered luciferase reporter from a deep sea shrimp utilizing a novel imidazopyrazinone substrate. ACS Chem. Biol. 7, 1848–1857. doi: 10.1021/cb3002478
  4. Machleidt, T., Woodroofe, C. C., Schwinn, M. K., Méndez, J., Robers, M. B., Zimmerman, K., et al. (2015). NanoBRET - a novel BRET platform for the analysis of protein–protein interactions. ACS Chem. Biol. 10, 1797–1804. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.5b00143
  5. Kilpatrick, L. E., Friedman-Ohana, R., Alcobia, D. C., Riching, K., Peach, C. J., Wheal, A. J., et al. (2017). Real-time analysis of the binding of fluorescent VEGF165a to VEGFR2 in living cells: effect of receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and fate of internalized agonist-receptor complexes. Biochem. Pharmacol. 136, 62–75. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.04.006
  6. Liu, J., O'Kane, D. J., and Escher, A. (1997). Secretion of functional Renilla reniformis luciferase by mammalian cells. Gene 203, 141–148. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00505-2
  7. White, C. W., Vanyai, H. K., See, H. B., Johnstone, E. K. M., and Pfleger, K. D. G. (2017). Using nanoBRET and CRISPR/Cas9 to monitor proximity to a genome-edited protein in real-time. Sci. Rep. 7:3187. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03486-2

Configure your microplate reader and get an initial recommendation!

Newsletter Sign-up