Reactive oxygen species detection
Table of contents
What are reactive oxygen species (ROS)?
Reactive oxygen species are unstable molecules, which contain oxygen as a byproduct of the natural metabolism of oxygen. These molecules are very reactive and come in many different forms, examples include: H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide), NO (nitric oxide), O2-(oxide anion), peroxynitrite (ONOO-), hydrochlorous acid (HOCl), and hydroxyl radical (OH-)1.
When reactive oxygen species build up at high levels inside cells, also referred to as oxidative stress, they can damage DNA, RNA and proteins, and even cause cell death. ROS biomolecules have been implicated in a range of pathologies, including cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, atherosclerosis and the process of ageing2. The body responds to oxidative stress by increasing production of antioxidants such as catalase and glutathione which convert dangerous free radicals to harmless molecules, such as water3.
Low levels of reactive oxygen species have been found to have useful and beneficial effects. For example, they play an important role in regulating cellular signaling and gene expression. Evidence suggests that reactive oxygen species may modulate cell differentiation, including hematopoietic differentiation involving stem cell production, in both physiological and pathological (disease) conditions4.
There are many intracellular sources of reactive oxygen species, including cell mitochondria and NADPH oxidases (NOX enzymes) linked to neutrophils2, white blood cells, which produce high levels of ROS as part of their defense role. A wide range of enzymes also produce ROS, including xanthine oxidase, nitric oxide synthase, cyclooxygenases, cytochrome P450 enzymes and lipoxygenases.
Oxidative stress is further induced by exogenous stimuli. For instance, alcohol leads to formation of reactive oxygen species during its degradation and induce ROS production by activation of cytochrome P450 enzymes5. A second example of a drug inducing ROS is tobacco smoke. It contains radicals reacting with oxygen to form ROS6. An exogenous ROS-inducer that is less avoidable is ultraviolet light. The induction of reactive oxygen species increases oxidative damage to cellular components and thus contributes to the development of skin cancer7.
Assays detecting reactive oxygen species
As reactive oxygen species impact on many biological events, they are studied extensively. Assays to measure ROS are used to report on immune responses, to monitor the balance of ROS and antioxidants or to study their role in cancer development. However, detecting ROS levels can be difficult as they are often in the nanomolar range and have very short half-lives.
The most common reagent used for measuring ROS is 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA). It is intracellularly trapped by esterase activity that removes lipophilic blocking groups. Upon oxidation of the probe by ROS the resulting dichlorofluorescein (DCF) exhibits high fluorescence. Different derivatives of H2DCFDA are employed for reactive oxygen species measurements as they have specific characteristics: carboxy-H2DCFDA displays an improved cellular retention whereas the fluorinated molecule (H2DFFDA) proves more stable when exposed to light.
A probe that selectively detects superoxide generated in mitochondria during oxidative phosphorylation is MitoSOX™ Red (ThermoFisher). The live cell reagent is targeted to mitochondria and its oxidation by superoxide increases its red fluorescence.
Apart from fluorescent probes added to the cell culture, genetically encoded probes may report on changes in reactive oxygen species directly in the cell at the location of interest. The fluorescent probe roGFP (redox sensitive green fluorescent protein) has different excitation wavelengths dependent on its redox state: reduced roGFP can be excited at 488 nm whereas oxidized roGFP is better excited at 405 nm (Fig. 2). A peroxidase that scavenges selectively H2O2 facilitates oxidation of roGFP and the ratio of measurements performed with both excitation wavelengths reports on the presence of H2O2 8. A similar approach is employed by the genetically encoded H2O2 sensor HyPer.
Next to fluorescent methods, luminescent methods are available to detect reactive oxygen species. On the one hand, there are methods based on chemiluminescence. They employ a molecule such as luminol or lucigenin that emit light when transitioning to their oxidized state. As this process is induced by ROS, light emission can be directly translated to the presence of ROS9. On the other hand, enzyme-dependent luminescence (bioluminescence) detects ROS. The enzyme is a luciferase that converts a substrate under the emission of light. A precursor of the substrate is added to the sample and is ROS-dependently converted into the luciferase substrate. Thus the luminescent signal correlates with ROS levels10.
Instrumentation required for detecting reactive oxygen species
These popular methods to study and measure levels of reactive oxygen species are based on fluorescent or luminescent read-outs. This makes it possible to use a microplate format allowing running 96 up to 1536 samples at once and performing the detection in microplate readers. These devices record light signals in the tiny reactions taking place in the wells of a microplate.
Dectection modes: depending on the assay chosen to detect reactive oxygen species the ideal microplate reader needs to cover either luminescence, fluorescence or both if the flexibility running different assays should be given. However, if you would like to combine the Reactive oxygen species measurement with other assays, further detection modes may need to be covered as well. An example would be the combination of ROS-measurements with absorbance-based viability assays such as WST. BMG LABTECH offers a range of multi-mode plate reader capable of measuring luminescence, fluorescence, absorbance and advanced detection modes.
Sensitivity: The sensitivity the ideal microplate reader needs to offer is dictated by the plate format that is used and by the ROS-assay itself. For instance high density plate formats (1536 well) have a lower reaction volume and lower signal intensities. This requires highest sensitivity of the microplate reader and a fast reading of the plate. The PHERAstar FSX microplate reader is designed to meet exactly these requirements.
The most commonly used Reactive oxygen species assay, the H2DCFDA assay, gives high signal intensities when used in 96-well or 384-well format and with sufficient material, for instance when using immortal cell lines. For instance, the signals can be easily recorded by all BMG LABTECH multi-mode readers. Increased sensitivity is required by genetically encoded probes such as roGFP since expression levels are limited. Researcher Prince Saforo Amponsah from the Technical University Kaiserslautern explains in detail the challenge to read the fluorescent probe and how the CLARIOstar® assisted the measurements.
Accessories: Reactive oxygen species detection based on H2DCFDA, bioluminescence or roGFP is suitable to be kinetically measured in live cells. Depending on the time frame of interest, live cell measurements require a gas atmosphere to allow long-term cell incubation. In particular this is a CO2 atmosphere of 5 10 % to guarantee a stable pH in carbonate buffered media. For the measurement of reactive oxygen species the surrounding O2 concentration plays a critical role. The atmospheric O2 level of 21 % alone is capable of inducing oxidative stress without further stimulation. Physiologic O2 concentrations that cells are exposed to in the human body are much lower ranging from 4 % in the brain and 10 % in the kidney11. Accordingly, reliable ROS measurements can only be achieved when measuring at lower O2 concentrations. The atmospheric control unit (ACU) regulates both the CO2 and O2 concentration in the microplate reader and thus allows running ROS experiments at physiological O2. The tool is available for CLARIOstar and Omega microplate readers.
If you are interested in real-life data measuring reactive oxygen species on BMG LABTECH readers, please feel free to have a look into our collection of peer-reviewed articles on this topic: https://www.bmglabtech.com/citations/?tx_solr%5Bfilter%5D%5B0%5D=category_stringM%253A%252F1%252F6%252F59%252F
2. Holmström & Finkel. (2014) Cellular mechanisms and physiological consequences of redox-dependent signalling. Nature Reviews, Molecular Cell Biology (15) 411.